c# - Does more specific exception handling improve performance? -

-

if can catch more specific exception prevent clr doing work , benefit performance wise ? if know might socket exception not care handling differently other exception better still have more specific catch ? working on microframework small improvements in performance , resources worth asking about.

 catch (system.net.sockets.socketexception netex)             {              }   catch (exception ex)             {              }

i not think in terms of performance.

from code correctness perspective: should catch specific exception can.

when catch exception exception handler swallow any exception if not prepared handle it. imagine argumentnullexception thrown. catch block swallow , cause confusion.

if prepared handle socketexception catch that. if less performant it. code correctness not sacrifice such miniscule performance gain*

* or no performance gain @ - almost there zero execution time performance implication @ all. did benchmark on computer , performance more or less equal. not comprehensive test enough confirm instinct. can run own benchmark using technique similar this one


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

yii2 - Yii 2 Running a Cron in the basic template -

-
i have seen instructions on running cron in advanced template, cant figure out how on basic template. have following controller in basic controllers folder. <?php namespace app\controllers; use yii\console\controller; /** * cron controller */ class croncontroller extends controller { public function actionindex() { echo "cron service runnning"; } public function actionmail($to) { echo "sending mail " . $to; } } i have navigated root of application , tried these comands yii cron php yii cron im getting unknown comand "cron" i know old question failed find actual answer this. if @ code yii exec file you'll notice requires /common/config/aliases.php file console/config/main.php. can naturally change these or copy on these advanced template. hope solves problem wanting same thing.
Read more

asp.net - 'System.Web.HttpContext' does not contain a definition for 'GetOwinContext' Mystery -

-
i realize question might seem trivial some, it's these types of things find myself fighting quite bit , want make sense of despite seeming losing battle in .net (for me anyway). so, if following: using system.web; ... applicationuser user = system.web.httpcontext.getowincontext().getusermanager<applicationusermanager>().findbyid(system.web.httpcontext.user.identity.getuserid()); that produces error in title , red getowincontext() , error cannot resolve symbol 'getowincontext()' however, if following (remove system.web in front of httpcontext ), works expected (or @ least no errors): using system.web; ... applicationuser user = httpcontext.getowincontext().getusermanager<applicationusermanager>().findbyid(system.web.httpcontext.user.identity.getuserid()); however, if (same line that's working using system.web commented out): //using system.web; ... applicationuser user = httpcontext.getowincontext().getusermana...
Read more

mercurial graft feature, can it copy? -

-
there new feature in mercurial 3, called 'graft' (graft local). job of moving change-set different branch. is there way "copy" change-set branch? i interested in in moving stuff qa branch production branch, still need code reside in qa. want copy. found , have tried few things, maybe it'll become clear more tinkering , reading... does have better way of 'cherry picking' change-sets move cross branch (or trunk)??? graft copies changesets, doesn't move them. hg graft (emphasis mine): this command uses mercurial's merge logic copy individual changes other branches without merging branches in history graph. known 'backporting' or 'cherry-picking' . default, graft copy user, date, , description source changesets.
Read more