Does it make sense to proxy multiple tornado-based processes with nginx, where both of them are non-blocking I/O based? -

-

i found several online articles explains how proxy multiple tornado processes (using supervisord or something) nginx, can't understand reason why they're using tornado back-end server framework.

according understanding, both tornado , nginx non-blocking i/o based, if want benefits of non-blocking i/o, isn't 1 of them enough? there reasons choose non-blocking i/o based server both front-end , back-end?

yes, makes sense run multiple tornado processes , proxy of them. reason gil: each python process can make use of 1 core, make use of cores on machine must run multiple processes.

there number of ways run , manage multiple tornado processes, , not of them require load balancer nginx, recommended configuration because allows each process restarted independently zero-downtime updates.

the benefits of non-blocking i/o apply @ every level. using nginx load balancer reduce benefit see using tornado on backend, benefits still there, sites using long polling or websockets.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

yii2 - Yii 2 Running a Cron in the basic template -

-
i have seen instructions on running cron in advanced template, cant figure out how on basic template. have following controller in basic controllers folder. <?php namespace app\controllers; use yii\console\controller; /** * cron controller */ class croncontroller extends controller { public function actionindex() { echo "cron service runnning"; } public function actionmail($to) { echo "sending mail " . $to; } } i have navigated root of application , tried these comands yii cron php yii cron im getting unknown comand "cron" i know old question failed find actual answer this. if @ code yii exec file you'll notice requires /common/config/aliases.php file console/config/main.php. can naturally change these or copy on these advanced template. hope solves problem wanting same thing.
Read more

asp.net - 'System.Web.HttpContext' does not contain a definition for 'GetOwinContext' Mystery -

-
i realize question might seem trivial some, it's these types of things find myself fighting quite bit , want make sense of despite seeming losing battle in .net (for me anyway). so, if following: using system.web; ... applicationuser user = system.web.httpcontext.getowincontext().getusermanager<applicationusermanager>().findbyid(system.web.httpcontext.user.identity.getuserid()); that produces error in title , red getowincontext() , error cannot resolve symbol 'getowincontext()' however, if following (remove system.web in front of httpcontext ), works expected (or @ least no errors): using system.web; ... applicationuser user = httpcontext.getowincontext().getusermanager<applicationusermanager>().findbyid(system.web.httpcontext.user.identity.getuserid()); however, if (same line that's working using system.web commented out): //using system.web; ... applicationuser user = httpcontext.getowincontext().getusermana...
Read more

mercurial graft feature, can it copy? -

-
there new feature in mercurial 3, called 'graft' (graft local). job of moving change-set different branch. is there way "copy" change-set branch? i interested in in moving stuff qa branch production branch, still need code reside in qa. want copy. found , have tried few things, maybe it'll become clear more tinkering , reading... does have better way of 'cherry picking' change-sets move cross branch (or trunk)??? graft copies changesets, doesn't move them. hg graft (emphasis mine): this command uses mercurial's merge logic copy individual changes other branches without merging branches in history graph. known 'backporting' or 'cherry-picking' . default, graft copy user, date, , description source changesets.
Read more